Screener
MFSV vs TMFS
MFS Active Value ETF vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- MFSV costs 0.41% less per year.
- MFSV is significantly larger than TMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFSV | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $443M | $64M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +1.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.34% | 19.56% |
| Max drawdown | -12.74% | -48.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFSV and TMFS
Explore further