Screener
MFSV vs VFVA
MFS Active Value ETF vs Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF Shares
Key differences
- VFVA costs 0.31% less per year.
- VFVA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFSV | VFVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $443M | $815M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 1.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.6% | +30.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.34% | 15.53% |
| Max drawdown | -12.74% | -48.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFSV and VFVA
Explore further