Skip to content
Screener

MGNR vs GSLC

American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

MGNR

American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$867M

GSLC

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.09%

Fund size

$15.6B

Key differences

Both MGNR and GSLC are equity ETFs. MGNR charges 0.75% a year and GSLC 0.09%. The main difference: MGNR follows a active selection strategy; GSLC uses index enhanced.

  • MGNR follows a active selection strategy; GSLC uses index enhanced.
  • GSLC costs 0.66% less per year.
  • GSLC is much larger than MGNR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • GSLC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MGNRGSLC
Annual cost (TER)0.75%0.09%
Fund size (AUM)$867M$15.6B
Since20242015
Dividend yield1.08%0.93%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+63.1%+20.8%
CAGR 3YN/A+20.4%
CAGR 5YN/A+12.3%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.09
Volatility 1Y24.22%12.15%
Max drawdown-22.06%-33.69%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all growth funds

Similar to MGNR and GSLC