Screener
MID vs FDG
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- FDG is significantly larger than MID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MID | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $93M | $387M |
| Since | 2020 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.16% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | +35.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.6% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | +13.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.67% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -40.15% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MID and FDG
Explore further