Screener
MID vs IMCB
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IMCB costs 0.41% less per year.
- IMCB is significantly larger than MID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MID follows a active selection strategy; IMCB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IMCB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IMCB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MID | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $93M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2020 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.16% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.4% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.5% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +9.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.69% | 12.83% |
| Max drawdown | -40.15% | -40.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MID and IMCB
Explore further