Screener
MID vs NUMG
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF vs Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- NUMG costs 0.14% less per year.
- NUMG is significantly larger than MID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MID follows a active selection strategy; NUMG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MID has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MID | NUMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $93M | $354M |
| Since | 2020 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.16% | 0.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | -1.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.6% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.5% | +1.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.67% | 17.94% |
| Max drawdown | -40.15% | -38.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MID and NUMG
Explore further