Screener
MIDE vs USCA
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
Key differences
- USCA costs 0.08% less per year.
- USCA is significantly larger than MIDE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, USCA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MIDE | USCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $3.1B |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 1.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +22.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.01% | 12.18% |
| Max drawdown | -24.59% | -19.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MIDE and USCA
Explore further