Screener
MIDE vs XJR
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF vs iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- XJR is significantly larger than MIDE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, MIDE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MIDE | XJR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $138M |
| Since | 2021 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.37% | 1.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.9% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +5.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.95% | 17.92% |
| Max drawdown | -24.59% | -27.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MIDE and XJR
Explore further