Screener
MILN vs EMC
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Great Consumer ETF
Key differences
- MILN costs 0.15% less per year.
- MILN covers north america markets; EMC covers emerging markets.
- MILN follows a index tracking strategy; EMC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, EMC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MILN | EMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $61M |
| Since | 2016 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 0.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.3% | +36.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.07% | 20.53% |
| Max drawdown | -44.40% | -18.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MILN and EMC
Explore further