Screener
MILN vs HEAL
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF vs Global X HealthTech ETF
Key differences
- MILN is significantly larger than HEAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, MILN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MILN | HEAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $25M |
| Since | 2016 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 0.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.3% | -20.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | -10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | -14.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | -0.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.07% | 21.70% |
| Max drawdown | -44.40% | -65.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MILN and HEAL
Explore further