Screener
MILN vs QRMI
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
- MILN costs 0.10% less per year.
- MILN is significantly larger than QRMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MILN is classified as equity, while QRMI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MILN follows a index tracking strategy; QRMI uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, MILN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MILN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MILN | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $16M |
| Since | 2016 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 12.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.3% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.07% | 5.77% |
| Max drawdown | -44.40% | -20.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MILN and QRMI
Explore further