Screener
MILN vs QYLG
Global X Millennials Consumer ETF vs Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- QYLG costs 0.15% less per year.
- MILN is classified as equity, while QYLG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MILN follows a index tracking strategy; QYLG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, QYLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MILN | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $142M |
| Since | 2016 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 6.59% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.3% | +34.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +22.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | +14.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 1.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.07% | 12.31% |
| Max drawdown | -44.40% | -29.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MILN and QYLG
Explore further