Screener
MINO vs CGMU
PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 0.12% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than MINO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINO | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $623M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.83% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.8% | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.72% | 2.31% |
| Max drawdown | -15.24% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MINO and CGMU
Explore further