Screener
MLPI vs ENFR
Neos Mlp & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF vs Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- ENFR costs 0.33% less per year.
- MLPI follows a option income strategy; ENFR uses index tracking.
- ENFR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPI | ENFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $588M | $460M |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +21.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.54% |
| Max drawdown | -4.64% | -62.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPI and ENFR
Explore further