Screener
MLPR vs MLPX
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN vs Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- MLPR costs 0.45% less per year.
- MLPX is significantly larger than MLPR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MLPR follows a leveraged strategy; MLPX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MLPR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MLPX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPR | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.00% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2020 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 8.85% | 3.96% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.2% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.2% | +30.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +30.2% | +22.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.56% | 15.20% |
| Max drawdown | -48.99% | -64.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPR and MLPX
Explore further