Screener
MMID vs BLCV
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF vs iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF
Key differences
- BLCV costs 0.13% less per year.
- BLCV is significantly larger than MMID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MMID | BLCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $317M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.29% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +21.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.64% |
| Max drawdown | -7.93% | -13.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MMID and BLCV
Explore further