Screener
MMID vs IMCB
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IMCB costs 0.55% less per year.
- IMCB is significantly larger than MMID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MMID follows a active selection strategy; IMCB uses index tracking.
- IMCB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MMID | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.83% |
| Max drawdown | -7.93% | -40.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MMID and IMCB
Explore further