Screener
MMID vs IVOO
MFS Active Mid Cap ETF vs Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- IVOO costs 0.52% less per year.
- IVOO is significantly larger than MMID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MMID follows a active selection strategy; IVOO uses index tracking.
- IVOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MMID | IVOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $5.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.69% |
| Max drawdown | -7.93% | -42.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MMID and IVOO
Explore further