Screener
MNBD vs SPIB
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SPIB costs 0.40% less per year.
- SPIB is significantly larger than MNBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MNBD follows a active selection strategy; SPIB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SPIB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPIB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MNBD | SPIB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $11.0B |
| Since | 2022 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 3.33% | 4.43% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.13 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.47% | 2.85% |
| Max drawdown | -5.89% | -14.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MNBD and SPIB
Explore further