Skip to content
Screener

MOOD vs FAAR

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF vs First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF

MOOD

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.73%

Fund size

$143M

FAAR

First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.98%

Fund size

$176M

Key differences

Both MOOD and FAAR are alternative ETFs. MOOD charges 0.73% a year and FAAR 0.98%. The main difference: MOOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; FAAR uses long short.

  • MOOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; FAAR uses long short.
  • MOOD costs 0.25% less per year.
  • Over the last three years, MOOD has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • FAAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MOODFAAR
Annual cost (TER)0.73%0.98%
Fund size (AUM)$143M$176M
Since20222016
Dividend yield0.35%9.19%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth america
Strategytactical allocationlong short
CAGR 1Y+34.3%+33.2%
CAGR 3Y+20.6%+11.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.4%
Sharpe 3Y1.430.67
Volatility 1Y14.49%13.49%
Max drawdown-14.34%-18.03%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to MOOD and FAAR