Screener
MOTO vs ADPV
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Adaptiv Select ETF
Key differences
- MOTO costs 0.32% less per year.
- ADPV is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ADPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | ADPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $171M |
| Since | 2019 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 24.12% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -22.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and ADPV
Explore further