Screener
MOTO vs APUE
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
Key differences
- APUE costs 0.37% less per year.
- APUE is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, APUE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | APUE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2019 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +32.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -18.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and APUE
Explore further