Screener
MOTO vs BCTK
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Baron Technology ETF
Key differences
- MOTO costs 0.07% less per year.
- BCTK is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; BCTK uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | BCTK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $165M |
| Since | 2019 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -13.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and BCTK
Explore further