Screener
MOTO vs BDYN
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BDYN costs 0.28% less per year.
- BDYN is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO is classified as equity, while BDYN is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -10.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and BDYN
Explore further