Screener
MOTO vs BGRO
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF
Key differences
- BGRO costs 0.13% less per year.
- MOTO is classified as equity, while BGRO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MOTO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | BGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $9M |
| Since | 2019 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +27.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 18.05% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -24.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and BGRO
Explore further