Screener
MOTO vs CTEC
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Global X ClimateTech ETF
Key differences
- CTEC costs 0.18% less per year.
- CTEC is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; CTEC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MOTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | CTEC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $30M |
| Since | 2019 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.59% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +131.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +2.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | -2.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 34.90% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -81.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and CTEC
Explore further