Screener
MOTO vs EMES
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
Key differences
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; EMES uses index tracking.
- MOTO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | EMES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $11M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +43.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 20.75% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -12.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and EMES
Explore further