Screener
MOTO vs EVX
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs VanEck Environmental Services ETF
Key differences
- EVX costs 0.13% less per year.
- EVX is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; EVX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MOTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EVX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | EVX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $98M |
| Since | 2019 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +10.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 13.65% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -41.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and EVX
Explore further