Screener
MOTO vs FELC
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- FELC costs 0.50% less per year.
- FELC is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FELC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | FELC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $7.0B |
| Since | 2019 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +31.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 12.05% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -18.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and FELC
Explore further