Screener
MOTO vs FORH
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Formidable ETF
Key differences
- MOTO costs 0.51% less per year.
- MOTO is classified as equity, while FORH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; FORH uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, MOTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | FORH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $20M |
| Since | 2019 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 15.64% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -20.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and FORH
Explore further