Screener
MOTO vs KOMP
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
Key differences
- KOMP costs 0.48% less per year.
- KOMP is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; KOMP uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | KOMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2019 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +49.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 23.05% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -50.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and KOMP
Explore further