Screener
MOTO vs TMAT
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Main Thematic Innovation ETF
Key differences
- MOTO costs 0.14% less per year.
- TMAT is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO is classified as equity, while TMAT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; TMAT uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, TMAT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | TMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.82% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $211M |
| Since | 2019 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.02% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +41.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 24.16% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -58.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and TMAT
Explore further