Screener
MPLY vs CGMS
Monopoly ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMS costs 0.40% less per year.
- CGMS is significantly larger than MPLY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MPLY is classified as equity, while CGMS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MPLY covers global markets; CGMS covers north america.
- MPLY follows a active selection strategy; CGMS uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MPLY | CGMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $4.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.93% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.7% | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.22% | 3.49% |
| Max drawdown | -13.46% | -4.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MPLY and CGMS
Explore further