Screener
MPLY vs CZAR
Monopoly ETF vs Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
Key differences
- CZAR costs 0.44% less per year.
- MPLY is significantly larger than CZAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MPLY covers global markets; CZAR covers north america.
- MPLY follows a active selection strategy; CZAR uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MPLY | CZAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $2M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.47% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.7% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.22% | 12.50% |
| Max drawdown | -13.46% | -13.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MPLY and CZAR
Explore further