Screener
MPLY vs EMES
Monopoly ETF vs Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
Key differences
- EMES costs 0.14% less per year.
- MPLY follows a active selection strategy; EMES uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MPLY | EMES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $11M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.7% | +39.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.22% | 20.51% |
| Max drawdown | -13.46% | -12.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MPLY and EMES
Explore further