Screener
MSSS vs KAT
Monarch Select Subsector ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- KAT costs 0.68% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than MSSS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MSSS follows a index tracking strategy; KAT uses active selection.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MSSS | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.43% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $128M | $688M |
| Since | 2024 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.19% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.14% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MSSS and KAT
Explore further