Screener
MSTI vs ICSH
Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF vs iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
Key differences
- ICSH costs 0.28% less per year.
- ICSH is significantly larger than MSTI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MSTI follows a index tracking strategy; ICSH uses active selection.
- ICSH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MSTI | ICSH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $7.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 5.35% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 3.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.52% | 0.41% |
| Max drawdown | -1.47% | -3.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MSTI and ICSH
Explore further