Screener
MSTI vs SDFI
Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF vs AB Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- SDFI costs 0.06% less per year.
- SDFI is significantly larger than MSTI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MSTI follows a index tracking strategy; SDFI uses active selection.
- SDFI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MSTI | SDFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $173M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 5.35% | 4.67% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.52% | 2.09% |
| Max drawdown | -1.47% | -1.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MSTI and SDFI
Explore further