Screener
MTRA vs QTJL
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
Key differences
- MTRA costs 0.25% less per year.
- MTRA is significantly larger than QTJL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTRA is classified as equity, while QTJL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; QTJL uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | QTJL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $27M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 10.26% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -33.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and QTJL
Explore further