Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MTUM vs VFMO

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF vs Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF ETF Shares

MTUM

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$24.2B

VFMO

Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF ETF Shares

Vanguard

Annual cost

0.13%

Fund size

$1.6B

Key differences

  • MTUM is significantly larger than VFMO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MTUM follows a index tracking strategy; VFMO uses active selection.
  • Over the last 3 years, MTUM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • MTUM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MTUMVFMO
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.13%
Fund size (AUM)$24.2B$1.6B
Since20132018
Dividend yield0.69%0.66%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+35.3%+43.2%
CAGR 3Y+30.8%+27.8%
CAGR 5Y+14.5%+14.0%
Sharpe 3Y1.261.08
Volatility 1Y18.65%21.12%
Max drawdown-34.08%-36.77%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MTUM and VFMO