Screener
MUB vs CGMU
iShares National Muni Bond ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- MUB costs 0.22% less per year.
- MUB is significantly larger than CGMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CGMU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MUB | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.05% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $43.7B | $5.8B |
| Since | 2007 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.93% | 2.29% |
| Max drawdown | -13.68% | -4.10% |
Similar to MUB and CGMU
Explore further