Screener
MUSI vs YYY
American Century Multisector Income ETF vs Amplify CEF High Income ETF
Key differences
- MUSI costs 2.85% less per year.
- YYY is significantly larger than MUSI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MUSI is classified as fixed income, while YYY is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- MUSI follows a active selection strategy; YYY uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, YYY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- YYY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MUSI | YYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 3.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $214M | $712M |
| Since | 2021 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 5.74% | 12.48% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | +15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.0% | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.35% | 8.53% |
| Max drawdown | -13.91% | -42.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MUSI and YYY
Explore further