Screener
MUST vs CGMU
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU is significantly larger than MUST — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CGMU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MUST | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $594M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2018 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.30% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.8% | +4.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.11 | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.10% | 2.28% |
| Max drawdown | -13.83% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MUST and CGMU
Explore further