Screener
MUST vs HYSD
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF vs Columbia Short Duration High Yield ETF
Key differences
- MUST costs 0.21% less per year.
- MUST is significantly larger than HYSD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MUST follows a index tracking strategy; HYSD uses active selection.
- MUST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MUST | HYSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $594M | $105M |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.30% | 5.67% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.10% | 2.82% |
| Max drawdown | -13.83% | -2.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MUST and HYSD
Explore further