Screener
MUST vs MULT
Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF vs Franklin Multisector Income ETF
Key differences
- MUST costs 0.16% less per year.
- MUST is significantly larger than MULT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MUST covers north america markets; MULT covers emerging markets.
- MUST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MUST | MULT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.23% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $594M | $15M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.30% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.10% | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.83% | -1.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MUST and MULT
Explore further