Screener
MXI vs DMXF
iShares Global Materials ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE Index ETF
Key differences
- DMXF costs 0.27% less per year.
- DMXF is significantly larger than MXI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MXI | DMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $325M | $992M |
| Since | 2006 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 4.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.9% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.7% | +7.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.47% | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -39.52% | -34.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MXI and DMXF
Explore further