Screener
MXI vs EFV
iShares Global Materials ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF
Key differences
- EFV costs 0.08% less per year.
- EFV is significantly larger than MXI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MXI | EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $325M | $30.0B |
| Since | 2006 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 3.83% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.9% | +30.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.7% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.47% | 14.28% |
| Max drawdown | -39.52% | -43.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MXI and EFV
Explore further