Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MXI vs IOO

iShares Global Materials ETF vs iShares Global 100 ETF

MXI

iShares Global Materials ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$325M

IOO

iShares Global 100 ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$8.5B

Key differences

  • IOO is significantly larger than MXI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, IOO has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MXIIOO
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$325M$8.5B
Since20062000
Dividend yield1.78%0.86%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalglobal
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+31.6%+40.8%
CAGR 3Y+13.3%+26.1%
CAGR 5Y+5.8%+16.9%
Sharpe 3Y0.581.32
Volatility 1Y19.38%13.63%
Max drawdown-39.52%-31.43%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MXI and IOO