Screener
NATO vs CCOR
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- NATO costs 0.94% less per year.
- NATO is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NATO is classified as equity, while CCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- NATO follows a index tracking strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NATO | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $28M |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | -5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.70% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NATO and CCOR
Explore further