Screener
NATO vs CGGO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- NATO costs 0.12% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than NATO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NATO follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| NATO | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +38.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.70% | 16.82% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NATO and CGGO
Explore further